GRENADA’S Finance
Minister Nazim Burke was on one of his tours of mass deception on Wednesday,
while avoiding the issue of his dealings with the National Insurance Scheme.
He won’t
subject himself to any interview with the Associated Press, the Caribbean Media
Corporation or CARIBUDPATE News – but he went on very friendly territory Wednesday,
including of course – naturally – the Government Information Service.
He was all over
the place declaring that government did not “request” any money from the NIS,
while in the same breath stating that government has “business with the NIS” –
business that he says is “not wise” to speak about.
He told GBN
that the report (I guess supposedly the CARIBUPDATE and/or CC6 one) “is totally
false”, yet he told MTV that “this may be so, but..”
Mr Burke
went on a well thought-out and orchestrated campaign on Wednesday to try to
confuse people and deliberately mislead.
Also disingenuous
was his assertion that businesses and institutions do business all the time,
but they don’t speak about it.
The
government is –well just that – the government who supposedly is beholden to
the people. The National Insurance Scheme is not a private credit union or some
commercial bank – it belongs to the workers of Grenada technically.
Whatever
transactions that go on between the government of Grenada and the NIS are of
national interest – and it is fair for people like us to ask questions.
This “none
of-your-business” attitude that repeatedly comes from Burke does little credit
to his own government.
Burke must
stop hiding behind semantics, and state whether what we ascertain as the facts
are true or not – no beating around the bush.
Has not
government sought 10 million dollars from NIS, offering the organization land
and government bonds in return?
Isn’t this
the third time for the year the government has gone to the NIS with some “business
proposal” so that it can get money to “meet its current bills” – well in our
interpretation – to pay salaries?
This writer
is absolutely confident that these are the basic facts of the most recent
developments – and Burke can look to dance around it how he wants to his own
declining credibility.
Most of us
who have seen his sleek operations have always known that he is stingy with the
truth – no wonder he avoids as the plague any invitation to sit down for an
interview, at any time, at any place and under any general conditions of his
comfort.
Here is a
gentle reminder, my learned friend: The truth needs no avoidance to tough
questions.
“We are in business
with the NIS. The NIS is in business with us,” Burke told GBN on Wednesday.
Since the
Minister has an inability to piss straight – let me break it down for him.
What you are saying, sir, is that you went to the NIS (again) for more money, in exchange for lands and bonds, and it is considering the application
What you are saying, sir, is that you went to the NIS (again) for more money, in exchange for lands and bonds, and it is considering the application
So fair
enough – you are in business with the NIS, and the NIS is in business with you.
And what is
so sinister about this, that you cannot give a simple acknowledgement?
I suspect
the problem with the Minister is that it reminds people of the government’s
fiscal crisis, and how he has so badly mismanaged the economy, in yes sure – an
otherwise very, very difficult economic environment.
On another
note, I caught tonight Burke’s “despicable” responses to comment on the
management of the economy by members of the business community.
As true to form, without dealing item by item with the concerns raised, he went on a broadside to question their motive, to suggest that as if they are political motivated and have axe to grind with this government.
As true to form, without dealing item by item with the concerns raised, he went on a broadside to question their motive, to suggest that as if they are political motivated and have axe to grind with this government.
Burke even
accused members of the Chamber of “conspiring” with the previous government to
economically mismanage the country.
Is this Minister of Finance for real?
Or are we seeing a new standard of paranoia that is off the charts by his own consistent sweating state of nervous discomfort anytime he is seriously questioned?
But it
should not surprise those of us who have studied this government closely.
From the
Prime Minister on down, its standard response to anybody or any group that has
been “fresh enough” to ask tough questions – is to use state and other
resources to systematically try to smear them.
There is an orchestrated
one in full gear against Chester Humphrey for example – the man who was their
hero when he was lambasting the previous government – but all of a sudden is
the worse human being in town.
They had
tried it with Scholar when he sang a critical calypso a few years ago.
The same man
interestingly they were running down recently to contest a seat for them in St
Patrick’s West. (Good for Scholar he is not as “suicidal” and he is smart
enough to stay away from this “burning deck”)
Speaking
about Burke’s paranoia – as Lew Smith asked him about the CARIBUPDATE report on
the economy – he dismissed it with this retort: “This person has taken a very
strong dedicated commitment to try to bring the government down.”
Is that me
Sir?
Not guilty!
It wasn’t me
that has spent four years fighting for power, bad talking colleagues and
undermining leaders. (I have just been commenting on it).
You’ve done
a very good job at that – and you needed no help.
Is that the same Minister Burke that I heard the Minister for Education saying to the nation last night--that he was a genious at managing the economy? She also said that Prime Ministers in the region were asking for him to come and help them put their own economy in order.A pack of cards in Grenada seem to have more jokers in it.lol
ReplyDeleteIt may be common practice for businesses not to divulge their operations to the public, BUT they report to shareholders.
ReplyDeleteGov't's shareholders are the people of the country who should be reported to either directly through mass meetings, media, etc or though their representatives in Parliament.
This minister is full of deception & Semantics.